Confronted by evil: harry truman and the bombing of japan essay

In the Pacific, the U. To be sure, neither tactical deception nor cloak-and-dagger espionage alone makes the difference. Historian Sir Max Hastings, a chronicler of tradecraftreminded his readers that, in the end, soldiers, sailors, and airmen ultimately win wars. This high-stakes battle of wits continued in as Germany tried to guess where the Allies would launch a land invasion of France from England and both sides raced to develop a nuclear bomb.

Confronted by evil: harry truman and the bombing of japan essay

The decision to use the atomic bomb Written By: Truman received a long report from Secretary of War Henry L. Rooseveltthe expectations of the American public, an assessment of the possibilities of achieving a quick victory by other means, and the complex American relationship with the Soviet Union.

After returning home, he became convinced that he probably would have been killed if the war had lasted a few months longer.

His first-hand experience with warfare clearly influenced his thinking about whether to use the atomic bomb. It was also an expression of the American temperament; the United States was accustomed to winning wars and dictating the peace. On May 8,Germany surrendered unconditionally to great rejoicing in the Allied countries.

The hostility of the American public toward Japan was even more intense and demanded an unambiguous total victory in the Pacific. Truman was acutely aware that the country—in its fourth year of total war—also wanted victory as quickly as possible.

Dropping the Bomb - LewRockwell

A skilled politician who knew when to compromise, Truman respected decisiveness. Meeting with Anthony Edenthe British foreign secretary, in early May, he declared: Headed by Stimson and James Byrneswhom Truman would soon name secretary of state, the Interim Committee was a group of respected statesmen and scientists closely linked to the war effort.

After five meetings between May 9 and June 1, it recommended use of the bomb against Japan as soon as possible and rejected arguments for advance warning.

Scientists and the atomic bomb Among those who had full knowledge of the Manhattan Project to build an atomic bomb, most agreed that the weapon should be used. As he listened to them argue that the United States should refrain from using the bomb and that it should share its atomic secrets with the rest of the world after the war, Byrnes felt that he was dealing with unworldly intellectuals who had no grasp of political and diplomatic realities.

He neither took their suggestions seriously nor discussed them with Truman, who most likely would have shared his attitude anyway. Szilard and his associates seem to have represented only a small minority of the many hundreds of scientists who worked on the bomb project.

Confronted by evil: harry truman and the bombing of japan essay

In July project administrators polled of the scientists working at the Chicago site and could find only 19 who rejected any military use of the bomb and another 39 who supported an experimental demonstration with representatives of Japan present, followed by an opportunity for surrender.

Most of the scientists, however, supported some use of the bomb: McCloyclaimed to have opposed using the bomb, but there is no firm evidence of any substantial contemporary opposition. Most of the scientists, civilian leaders, and military officials responsible for the development of the bomb clearly assumed that its military use, however unpleasant, was the inevitable outcome of the project.

Truman faced almost no pressure whatever to reexamine his own inclinations. The military situation in the Pacific When Truman became president, a long and bitter military campaign in the Pacific, marked by fanatical Japanese resistance and strongly held racial and cultural hostilities on both sides, was nearing its conclusion.

In Februaryabout a month after he was sworn in as vice president, American troops invaded the small island of Iwo Jimalocated miles 1, km from Tokyo. The Americans took four weeks to defeat the Japanese forces and suffered nearly 30, casualties. On April 1, 12 days before he became president, the United States invaded Okinawalocated just miles km south of the Japanese home island of Kyushu.

The battle of Okinawa was one of the fiercest of the Pacific war.Truman: Bomb Dropping It was August 6, when the first ever atomic bomb dropped on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. Three days later another was dropped on the city of Nagasaki, Japan and this let to the surrender of Japan in World War II.

Truman’s Decision Was the Best of the Bad Options Available Deacon James H. Toner Editor’s note: The following essay by Deacon Toner is a response to Prof. John Paul Meenan’s critique of Deacon Jim Russell’s defense of President Truman’s decision to use atomic weapons against Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.

Was Truman Justified in dropping the atom bomb? Essay by mpagri, High School, 11th grade, A, September President Harry S. Truman - unexpectedly thrust into the position of Chief of Command - was confronted with the raging World War II and the creation of this new mystery weapon.

Hampton Institute

the bomb on Japan. I personally respect the 5/5(1). Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb it was Harry Truman’s decision if the weapon would be used with the goal to end the war. “It is an awful responsibility that has come to us,” the president wrote. given the same circumstances and choices that confronted him in Japan in , he said he would do exactly the same.

Harry Truman Harry Truman, a president who witnessed and was a part of some of the most memorable events in U.S. and world history, is said to have had a reputation for being an honest and efficient man.

Bearing this is mind, and bearing in also in mind their miscalculation of German resistance and the failure of bombing alone to reduce Germany to helplessness, the Combined Chiefs of Staff officially set the target date for Japan’s collapse at 15 November, , eighteen months after V.

E. day.

Harry Truman and the Atomic Bomb | Mises Institute