Was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified? On December 7th,Pearl harbour was attacked and bombed by Japanese pilots without warning, destroying and crippling everything in their path. In one swift stroke Japan had silenced yet enraged the whole of the United States. To avenge all those American lives lost, the United States launched the Manhattan project, developing the greatest weapon created at that time, the Atomic Bomb.
What happened on 6 August ? In the hold was an experimental bomb, codenamed Little Boy. In Hiroshima the air raid sirens had sounded twice that morning already. On both occasions the all clear followed swiftly. Enola Gay faced no resistance as it dropped the bomb. Forty five seconds later the city was destroyed in a blinding instant.
Eighty thousand men, women and children were killed and tens of thousands wounded, disfigured and poisoned by radiation from the bomb. Three days later, another nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki.
A week later, Japan surrendered. The bomb brought World War Two to a sudden end, but was it right to use it? Why did America use the bomb? World at War Fremantle Media.
Conclusion of the war The bomb was dropped to force a quick Japanese surrender. American commanders said it would save money and the lives of American servicemen and Japanese soldiers and civilians too. They said that to continue the war for weeks or months with conventional bombing and a US land invasion could have caused millions of Japanese deaths.
Retribution against the Japanese President Truman justified his decision by pointing to the unprovoked Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour and the murder of American prisoners.
A few days after the bombing he wrote: They wanted to demonstrate to the Japanese that they faced overwhelmingly superior forces. They also wanted their new rivals, the Soviet Union, to see their powerful new weapon in action.
Was it a just decision? Inthe idea of just war was firmly established in international law. In a just war, only combatants may be specifically targeted.
Harm caused to civilians must be proportional to military ends and any harm caused must be necessary for the achievement of military goals.
However, some argue that all citizens contribute to the war effort and can be a legitimate target in some cases. BBC History page on war ethics 3.
How did people react? Click each of the icons below to discover some of the surprising things key people thought at the time. This content uses functionality that is not supported by your current browser.Atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Truman had a choice, he had to decide whether to invade the island of kyushu, which could cost hundreds of thousands, even a million American lives or use the atomic bomb brought about by the Manhattan Project in Strategic Bombing Survey: The Effects of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, June 19, President’s Secretary’s File, Truman Papers.
H. Bix, Hirohito and the Making of . The United States was justified due to the unprovoked attack and bombing of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which occurred three years prior to the bombing of Hiroshima, it was necessary to stop the war because it saved thousands of American lives.
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Introduction. Statement by the President of the United States: "Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, and destroyed its usefulness to the enemy. That bomb had more power than 20, tons of T.N.T.
Bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki justified essays. November 9, No comments Job essay question do you agree essay introductions sample ielts pdf essay health and medicine nepali ssat essay june looking back essay french essay on fear of board exam. Were the Americans justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August ?
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in by the Americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer. Both sides of the issue have very justifiable arguments.